229486
222576
Should pets be a legal consideration when it comes to divorce?
Yes 
67.44%
No 
24.9%
Unsure 
7.66%
Total Votes:  8318

Should pets be a legal consideration when it comes to divorce?

Poll: Pets and divorce

The important role pets play in families who are separating is being addressed in proposed amendments to British Columbia's Family Law Act.

Attorney General Niki Sharma says amendments she introduced in B.C.'s legislature will clarify the law around pets, property and pensions for couples and families going through a separation or divorce.

She says the amendments, if passed, will provide more guidance for people and judges involved in a legal dispute.

The changes would require the consideration of factors that include each person's ability and willingness to care for a pet, the relationship a child has with the animal and the risk of family violence or threat of cruelty.

Sharma says other proposed amendments to the law would include making it easier to equitably divide property and improve the division of pensions.

The government says in a statement that the amendments are based on a review over several years of the Family Law Act to address both changes in society and developments in case law.

Sharma says in the statement that dividing a family can be an incredibly difficult experience and the changes will help make that easier.

She says the proposed amendments "better reflect the priorities and values of people today, including making sure the important role pets play in families is considered in the separation process."

V. Victoria Shroff, an animal law specialist at Shroff and Associates, says the changes reflect how pets are valued as unique family members by society, rather than inanimate property like furniture.

"Having relevant factors to consider for these difficult decisions will bring more clarity and is a welcome change," she says in the statement.

Another proposed change would make it easier to equally divide property by preventing the use of an outdated principle called the presumption of advancement, the government says.

"Historically, this principle applied only to property transferred from husband to wife, not a wife to their husband, or between same-sex spouses or unmarried spouses," the statement says.



Previous Polls

March 26, 2024 - 8107 votes
Should B.C. reassess its new requirement foreign graduate students must have a full-time job offer in order to study here?

Yes: 3987
No: 3299
Unsure: 821

March 25, 2024 - 8186 votes
Are you more or less confident in the B.C. economy than you were at this time last year?

More confident: 1387
Less confident: 6191
Unsure: 608

March 23, 2024 - 7024 votes
Should the military or civilian courts handle sexual assault and similar crimes in Canada's armed forces?

The military: 1815
Civilian courts: 4787
Unsure: 422

March 21, 2024 - 5860 votes
Do you suffer from seasonal allergies?

Yes: 3263
No: 2597

March 20, 2024 - 8211 votes
Are you concerned about an earlier, and longer, wildfire season this year in B.C. due to the milder than normal winter?

Yes: 6091
No: 1929
Unsure: 191





Previous Poll Results

Should B.C. reassess its new requirement foreign graduate students must have a full-time job offer in order to study here?

Total Votes:  8107
Yes: 
49.18%
No: 
40.69%
Unsure: 
10.13%

» Previous Polls

Have an idea for a poll question?
Email us [email protected]


230329
228921
223588
Castanet Classifieds
231011