I fail to see how the closing of Bernard to foot traffic becomes a debate on licensing bicycles. Had the writer taken the time to read the article, they would see that the closure is an effort to allow for more patio space so that restaurants can accommodate more people and attempt to turn a profit.
As a downtown cyclist, my first thought was that I would now be dismounting and walking through this area to avoid people and patios or avoid the area altogether while on my bike.
What exactly is your vendetta against cyclists? I believe you are barking up the wrong tree on this one.
Caroline Loesgen